-
Interpretation of the number "one" in the claims
2025-05-05——(2020)Supreme People’s Court Final Civil Judgment No.1070Shenzhen Chuzhidao Environmental Protection Hi-Tech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Chuzhidao Company) is the patentee of the invention of "Dynamic Physical Shielding Purifier". Chuzhidao Company believed that the product being sued wi -
Zhejiang's first judicial interpretation of punitive damages with "Wyeth" received 30.55 million yuan in compensation
2025-05-05On April 26, the 21st World Intellectual Property Day, the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court opened a second-instance trial and declared the first case applying to the Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation on the Application of Punitive Damages to the Trial of Civil Cases of Infringement on Intellect -
Interpretation and application of the leading "Case of dispute over the infringement on the exclusive right of integrated circuit layout design between Wuxi New Silicon Microelectronics Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Rixin Technology Co., Ltd."
2025-05-05On December 14, 2020, the CNIPA released the leading case for administrative enforcement of intellectual property rights "Case of dispute over the infringement on the exclusive right of integrated circuit layout design between Wuxi New Silicon Microelectronics Co., Ltd. and Nanjing Rixin Technology -
Four cases involving intersecting civil and administrative procedures for patents of medical application inventions were held in the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme People's Court
2025-05-05On the morning of April 25, the Intellectual Property Tribunal of the Supreme Peoples Court carried out trial to consolidate four cases involving trot and administrative confirmation of rights for medical invention patents.Two medical invention patents of “Levo-Ornidazole” from Shenghe Company were -
Interpretation of the "deceptive" provision in the prohibition provisions of trademark registration
2025-05-05Article 10 of the Trademark Law stipulates several situations in which "shall not be used as trademarks". Among those, item (7) regulates that “Those in the nature of fraud in advertising that easily confuses the public with the quality or other characteristics or origins of the goods, or the place